Hi!
I'm trying to concatenate huge strings using table.concat()
local n=7
collectgarbage()
local a = { ("a"):rep(2^30) }
for j = 2, n do
a[j] = a[1]
end
local b = table.concat(a)
print("GBytes used:", #b/2^30, collectgarbage("count")/2^20)
I expect table.concat to act wisely:
it should calculate the result string length, allocate its
memory and fill it with the result content.
So, for concatenating n copies of 1GB-string only (n+1) GBytes
of memory would be needed:
1 GByte for the source string and n GBytes for the result
string.
Contrary to my expectation, on a 16 GB RAM Linux machine: n=7
works OK, but n=8 starts eating swap space.
It looks like table.concat temporarily uses twice more memory
than it is actually needed for a clever concatenation.
Unlike table.concat, the usual Lua concatenation operator
does not have this problem. It may be used as a workaround,
but it is limited by the number of VM registers.
