Re: [FUN] Compress number in 2 bytes

[Egor Skriptunoff <egor.skriptunoff@...>]

On Sat, Jul 3, 2021 at 2:14 PM Xmilia Hermit wrote:

Almost solved!

64 is better than 256, but still not good enough

Try to use the same idea to reduce hash part size to 8 hash slots.

Why not just one slot?

Your 1-slot decoder takes about 2^64 loop iterations to find the number.

This is obviously not a solution.

Calculations should be completed in a reasonable amount of time.