[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Performance problem with table.move
- From: Viacheslav Usov <via.usov@...>
- Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2020 13:29:34 +0100
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 1:16 PM Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com> wrote:
> It seems to me that someone forgot to apply the same optimization for "unsigned int", into gcc code.
The same optimization does not exist for unsigned int, because it is
only made possible by the undefined behavior of the signed int
overflow.
Cheers,
V.
- References:
- Performance problem with table.move, Egor Skriptunoff
- Re: Performance problem with table.move, Xmilia Hermit
- Re: Performance problem with table.move, Egor Skriptunoff
- Re: Performance problem with table.move, Ranier Vilela
- Re: Performance problem with table.move, Andrew Gierth
- Re: Performance problem with table.move, Ranier Vilela
- Re: Performance problem with table.move, Andrew Gierth
- Re: Performance problem with table.move, Ranier Vilela
- Re: Performance problem with table.move, Andrew Gierth
- Re: Performance problem with table.move, Ranier Vilela
- Re: Performance problem with table.move, Xmilia Hermit
- Re: Performance problem with table.move, Ranier Vilela