Re: Why Lua table pairs iteration doesn't hold the last key's position in Node[] ?

lua-l archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Subject: Re: Why Lua table pairs iteration doesn't hold the last key's position in Node[] ?
From: Roberto Ierusalimschy <roberto@...>
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2020 16:09:17 -0300

> why pairs doesn't return a C closure with an integer upvalue to hold
> the last key's position in Node[] ?
> I think this can be improved.

Certainly it could. Only note that this would demand a change in the C
API, too.

-- Roberto

References:
- Why Lua table pairs iteration doesn't hold the last key's position in Node[] ?, 张伟智

Prev by Date: Re: Why Lua table pairs iteration doesn't hold the last key's position in Node[] ?
Next by Date: Re: Why Lua table pairs iteration doesn't hold the last key's position in Node[] ?
Previous by thread: Re: Why Lua table pairs iteration doesn't hold the last key's position in Node[] ?
Next by thread: Re: Why Lua table pairs iteration doesn't hold the last key's position in Node[] ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread