Re: Question about to-be-closed methods

[Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@...>]

On Tue, 21 Jul 2020 at 22:46, Viacheslav Usov <via.usov@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 10:58 PM Dibyendu Majumdar
> <mobile@majumdar.org.uk> wrote:
>
> > There was a talk several
> > years ago by a Google engineer that said essentially there is no point
> > trying to recover after a memory failure. Fail fast is often a better
> > approach - because trying to recover in that scenario could cause more
> > damage because of further failures.
>
> Either the interpretation is too naive, or the original statement is
> nonsensical.
>

For reference
https://youtu.be/NOCElcMcFik
At 38m past