Re: [ANN] Lua 5.4.0 (rc4) now available

[Andrew Gierth <andrew@...>]

>>>>> "Roberto" == Roberto Ierusalimschy <roberto@inf.puc-rio.br> writes:

 Roberto> The tests are different. (This error regards a change in the
 Roberto> text of some error messages.)

Are these tests not expected to be very portable? This is the first time
I've tried running them...

So far I've run into:

1. Interactive test assumes that readline will output the prompt even if
stdin is not a tty, which seems to be false when using libedit

2. lseek on a tty is expected to fail, which is not the case on FreeBSD
(posix spec says this is implementation-defined)

3. popen/execute test seems to assume that execution of the command
   "sh -c 'kill -s HUP $$'" will exit, rather than die of signal 1

-- 
Andrew.