Ah, the thread has been broken a couple times. Apologies. I would have replied to it instead. Is this the message you mean?
http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2020-03/msg00017.htmlAnyway, the point of my message was not simply the idea of using [a,b,c] for multi-indices. Rather it was a proposal that keeps backward compatibility. In particular the problem of multiple function returns, the weird order of arguments in __newindex, and the fact that __index and __newindex are only called when the key is not present in the table. Those were not discussed before, and there is no chance a proposal like that would be accepted without the compatibility. It would break everything.
The question is: is there any existing code that would break under this proposal?
