lua-users home
lua-l archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]


On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 8:43 PM Archie Cobbs <archie.cobbs@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 6:01 PM Jonathan Goble <jcgoble3@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020, 5:45 PM Archie Cobbs <archie.cobbs@gmail.com> wrote:
Is there some Lua authority out there who can provide feedback on this idea? How are Lua patches supposed to be reviewed around here?

In general, they aren't, at least not directly. Lua is open source but not open developed. Proposals are normally discussed in terms of ideas and concepts rather than as concrete code and patches (though example code may help facilitate the discussion).

From there, the Lua team (Roberto, Luiz, and one other person who I always forget because he never posts to the list) makes the decision on their own, often without announcement. If they choose to adopt a community-proposed idea, they will write their own implementation rather than use code from the outside. 

That sounds pretty lame, to be honest. That kind of model works directly against building a coherent open source community.

Hmm.

-Archie

That's because PUC-Rio Lua is not a community project. It's maintained by a dedicated group attached to a university (PUC Rio) and the project is designed to satisfy their needs in particular. It's open-source, in that the code is available under a free software license, but the PUC-Rio distribution of Lua is a closed development model. Not accepting third-party contributions makes a number of things more straightforward and less legally risky, and it gives them the flexibility to make decisions based on what's good for the project instead of what's popular with the community.

/s/ Adam