Re: Suggestion: names-isolation-statement

[Coda Highland <chighland@...>]

On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 5:58 AM Viacheslav Usov <via.usov@gmail.com> wrote:

In principle, this proposal makes the keyword function redundant, so, for example, a pure function could be unambiguously defined via []f(x, y, z) end  --:)

Coincidentally, this is basically C++'s syntax for the same task.

I can't say for sure if that's a good thing...

/s/ Adam