[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Syntactical ugliness - does it matter?
- From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@...>
- Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2019 15:49:30 +0100
On Wed, 5 Jun 2019 at 15:47, Matthew Wild <mwild1@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 5 Jun 2019 at 15:42, Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@majumdar.org.uk> wrote:
> > But if you say:
> >
> > local resource x = 0
> >
> > Then x is a variable, and resource is a qualifier.
> >
> > Does that make sense?
>
> No, because that's a valid statement in Lua 5.3 that means something
> different. So my point stands: this proposal is a
> backwards-incompatible change that affects existing code.
>
How is it a valid statement?
local resource x = 0
is invalid in Lua.
- References:
- Syntactical ugliness - does it matter?, Dibyendu Majumdar
- Re: Syntactical ugliness - does it matter?, Pavel
- Re: Syntactical ugliness - does it matter?, Oliver Kroth
- Re: Syntactical ugliness - does it matter?, Ulrich Schmidt
- Re: Syntactical ugliness - does it matter?, Sergey Zakharchenko
- Re: Syntactical ugliness - does it matter?, Rodrigo Azevedo
- Re: Syntactical ugliness - does it matter?, Egor Skriptunoff
- Re: Syntactical ugliness - does it matter?, Dibyendu Majumdar
- Re: Syntactical ugliness - does it matter?, Ryan Ford
- Re: Syntactical ugliness - does it matter?, szbnwer@<a href="/cgi-bin/echo.cgi?gmail.com">...</a>
- Re: Syntactical ugliness - does it matter?, Matthew Wild
- Re: Syntactical ugliness - does it matter?, Dibyendu Majumdar
- Re: Syntactical ugliness - does it matter?, Matthew Wild
- Re: Syntactical ugliness - does it matter?, Dibyendu Majumdar
- Re: Syntactical ugliness - does it matter?, Matthew Wild