|
It was thus said that the Great joy mondal once stated:
> Hi Everybody and Sean !
Hi.
> I noticed something odd ( I am following the design decisions I have
> previously learnt from Sean Conner).
>
> When using lpeg.Cc with lpeg.Cmt, for whatever reason if you create a
> object with lpeg.Cc expect the object to be
>
> deleted or garbage collected by lpeg internals.
>
> Here is a concrete simplified example:
>
> local fin = { }
> local add = function(all, pos, constant)
> table.insert(fin, constant)
> print(fin)
> return pos
> end
> local test_constant = { 'hello', 'world'}
>
> local gram = Cmt (((Cc(test_constant)) * P('a')), add)
>
> local patt = gram ^ 1
>
> return patt:match('aa')
>
> ------<| CONSOLE OUTPUT START |>--------
>
> {
> {"hello", "world"}
> }
> {
> {"hello", "world"}, nil -- nil should be {"hello", "world"}, why is the
> constant being garbage collected.
> }
>
> ------<| CONSOLE OUTPUT END |>--------
It's hard to say what you were expecting, so I ran the code using Lua
5.3.4 and LPEG 1.0.2. I modifed the code to include LPEG and to dump the
fin table instead of just returning the results of patt:match() (which will
be 3 by the way), and I got:
table: 0x8eaf940
table: 0x8eaf940
fin =
{
[1] =
{
[1] = "hello",
[2] = "world",
},
[2] = fin.[1],
}
The first two lines are from add(), and the rest are the result of a custom
table dump routine I've written
(https://github.com/spc476/lua-conmanorg/blob/master/lua/table.lua#L131).
You can see that the table fin contains two references to test_constant.
> In situations like this are we expected to assume the object created with
> lpeg.Cc will be deleted and make copies ? Or is my usage of Cmt with Cc
> unjustified ?
I also ran the code with Lua 5.1.5/LPEG 0.12 and Lua 5.2.4/LPEG 1.0.0 and
got the results shown above.
I can't say unjustified, but something weird is going on with your code.
-spc (I'm only reporting what I'm seeing ... )