[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: [ANN] Lua 5.4.0 (work2) now available
- From: Albert Chan <albertmcchan@...>
- Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2018 09:10:51 -0400
> On Aug 26, 2018, at 7:05 AM, Dirk Laurie <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> This seems to imply that it is perfectly OK to return any value from 0
> to 4566 for 0x1p1000%4567, instead of the correct value 4567 that Lua
> 5.3 returns. Correct-shmorrect, I say.
+1 to Dirk
Garbage is garbage, even if it is not "arbitrary" garbage.
In fact, I prefer the "bad" garbage, as a heads-up, this is bad ...
Why fix a good % ?