Re: Lua 5.0 wasn't that bad, actually

[Roberto Ierusalimschy <roberto@...>]

> It’s interesting though, as Dirk notes, that tables USED to have this value in 5.0 and it was later dropped, so in some ways it’s a wash.

Tables in Lua never had this value. Lua 5.0 used either the field 'n' (if
present) or an auxiliary weak table to keep the size of arrays.

-- Roberto