Re: A tiny matter of style

[Lorenzo Donati <lorenzodonatibz@...>]

On 09/05/2018 18:24, Egor Skriptunoff wrote:
> On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 11:11 AM, Dirk Laurie wrote:
>
> > When the right-hand side of an assignment is an anonymous function, I
> > nowadays put a semicolon after the final "end" to distinguish it from
> > other uses of  'end'. Do you like the idea or hate it?
> Some programming languages (e.g PL/SQL) have distinct syntax for "end"
> depending on the statement:
>
> if ... end if;
> for k in 1..5 loop ... end loop;
> case ... end case;
> function FuncName ... end FuncName;

I often comment the end of scopes that span over about 15-20 lines, 
especially when there are multiple nested scopes. For example

if ....
  for ...
   -- blah
  end -- for

  function MyFunc(....)
   -- more blah
  end -- function MyFunc
end -- if

You get the gist of it.
It helps a lot when debugging or refactoring code.


I wouldn't mind if Lua allowed an optional syntax for specifying what 
"end" ends; optional but enforced if used, i.e. an error would be issued 
if (say) "end for" didn't end a for structure.

I can't say if it would be too heavy for the compiler or if a nice 
syntax could be devised that didn't render the grammar too complicated

For example:

end for         (ambiguous)
vs.
end for;
vs.
end ---for      (semantic comments?)
vs.
end ::for::     (fake label? ambiguous)
vs.
<choose your poison!>

Just rambling, not a well fleshed-out RFE anyway.

> Do you want to achieve the same goal by appending a semicolon to "end"?

Cheers!

-- Lorenzo