[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: new PRNG's
- From: Hartmut Henkel <hartmut_henkel@...>
- Date: Tue, 8 May 2018 23:53:38 +0200 (CEST)
On Tue, 8 May 2018, Rodrigo Azevedo wrote:
> Just an update of a real-world application. I'm working on a
> scientific stochastic code that "can" use the default PRNG of luajit
> and lua-5.4.0-work1 (don't worry!). Compared to luajit,
> lua-5.4.0-work1 exhibits a higher convergence rate, which is a symptom
> of a (maybe) better PRNG. Moreover, luajit is "only" 60% faster (no
> I/O bound) than lua-5.4.0-work1, which makes me think about forgetting
> luajit forever.
Just a remark, if good convergence rate is needed, e. g. for Monte Carlo
simulation or integration, Halton or Sobol "low-discrepancy" sequences
may perform better than PRNG and can be used as drop-in replacements. E.
g.,
local halton = function (index, base)
-- from en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halton_sequence
local result = 0
local f = 1
local i = index
while i > 0 do
f = f / base
result = result + f * (i % base)
i = math.floor(i / base)
end
return result
end
Regards, Hartmut
- References:
- new PRNG's, Albert Chan
- Re: new PRNG's, Albert Chan
- Re: new PRNG's, KHMan
- Re: new PRNG's, Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: new PRNG's, KHMan
- Re: new PRNG's, Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: new PRNG's, KHMan
- Re: new PRNG's, Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: new PRNG's, Sergey Rozhenko
- Re: new PRNG's, Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: new PRNG's, Rodrigo Azevedo