[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Clamping down on unwanted using "strict"... or others?
- From: Paul Merrell <marbux@...>
- Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2018 07:27:59 -0800
On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 1:06 AM, sur-behoffski
<sur_behoffski@grouse.com.au> wrote:
> Roberto's written a short "strict.lua" script, that resides in the
> etc/ subdirectory of the release, but isn't explicitly installed on
> at least two Debian-descendant distributions that I've used, including
> the source-based Gentoo Linux.
>
> Roberto's script is explicitly compatible with Lua 5.1 and 5.2. I
> haven't checked whether the 5.3 case works (I'm limiting myself to
> 5.1, for the moment).
I use strict.lua with v. 5.3 routinely, although I don't remember
where I got it.
Best regards,
Paul
--
[Notice not included in the above original message: The U.S. National
Security Agency neither confirms nor denies that it intercepted this
message.]