Re: Proposal: package.(c)path as tables

[Oliver Kroth <oliver.kroth@...>]

Am 07.09.2017 um 12:46 schrieb Martin:
> > There is simple workaround for this too:
> >
> >    v5.5 Introduce "package.path_t", "package.cpath_t".
not that I see a benefit of creating another interface for a more or 
less static configuration item...
Why not name them package.paths and package.cpaths to indicate the 
plurality and avoid this technical markup '_t' ?
And going further; it is possible to implement this in pure Lua using 
metatables...

--
Oliver