[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Component syntax
- From: "Soni L." <fakedme@...>
- Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 13:29:10 -0300
A while back I talked about component syntax, which I described as
`a:b.c()` and `a:[b].c()`.
I'd like to bring this up again, this time with a more concrete example.
I've been playing with SVG, and here's an example of how this syntax
could be used:
circle(5, 5, 2):fill(rgb(192, 128, 16)):stroke(rgb(0, 0,
0)):stroke.width(px(1))
Currently, this has to be written as:
circle(5, 5, 2):fill(rgb(192, 128, 16)):stroke(rgb(0, 0,
0)):stroke_width(px(1))
Which IMO just isn't quite as nice.
I'd still like to insist on `a:[b].c()` because of those of us who use
types. With `a:[b].c()`, one could implement a fully functional trait
system.
--
Disclaimer: these emails may be made public at any given time, with or without reason. If you don't agree with this, DO NOT REPLY.