[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: [ANN] LPeg 1.0.1
- From: Patrick Donnelly <batrick@...>
- Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2017 12:03:57 -0400
On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 6:30 PM, Sean Conner <email@example.com> wrote:
> It was thus said that the Great Alexander Nasonov once stated:
>> Roberto Ierusalimschy wrote:
>> > > On 13/01/2017 15:57, Roberto Ierusalimschy wrote:
>> > > lua: test.lua:1135: too many results to unpack
>> > > [...]
>> > Fixed. (Lua 5.1 has a much lower limit for the number of values returned
>> > by a function. Both issues were with the test file, not with LPeg
>> > itself.) Thanks for the feedback.
>> Apart from this issue, what bugs were fixed in 1.0.1?
> A bug raised in September  that I recently reminded Roberto of .
>  http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2016-09/msg00189.html
> lpeg = require"lpeg"
>> local patt = lpeg.Cg(lpeg.Ct"", "foo") * lpeg.Cb "foo" * lpeg.Cb "foo";
>> print(patt:match "")
table: 0x1926fd0 table: 0x1927010
Doesn't look fixed? Are you referring to some other issue?