Re: [ANN] LPeg 1.0.1

[Patrick Donnelly <batrick@...>]

Hi Sean,

On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 6:30 PM, Sean Conner <sean@conman.org> wrote:
> It was thus said that the Great Alexander Nasonov once stated:
>> Roberto Ierusalimschy wrote:
>> > > On 13/01/2017 15:57, Roberto Ierusalimschy wrote:
>> > > lua: test.lua:1135: too many results to unpack
>> > > [...]
>> >
>> > Fixed. (Lua 5.1 has a much lower limit for the number of values returned
>> > by a function. Both issues were with the test file, not with LPeg
>> > itself.)  Thanks for the feedback.
>>
>> Apart from this issue, what bugs were fixed in 1.0.1?
>
>   A bug raised in September [1] that I recently reminded Roberto of [2].
>
>   -spc
>
> [1]     http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2016-09/msg00189.html

> lpeg = require"lpeg"
> lpeg.version()
1.0.1
> do
>>
>> local patt = lpeg.Cg(lpeg.Ct"", "foo") * lpeg.Cb "foo" * lpeg.Cb "foo";
>> print(patt:match "")
>> end
table: 0x1926fd0        table: 0x1927010

Doesn't look fixed? Are you referring to some other issue?

-- 
Patrick Donnelly