[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Warnings compiling LPeg
- From: Roberto Ierusalimschy <roberto@...>
- Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 16:36:30 -0300
> I'm not sure how I feel about this. It seems problematic. For development
> and initial testing, I don't define NDEBUG (so asserts are enabled) and yet,
> here's some code that "arbitrarily" sets NDEBUG if some other define isn't
> defined. I know I can change the code, but I'd rather not have to patch it
> if possible. I know the intent is to avoid including debugging code by
> default but I would think there would have to be a better way.
This definition is inside LPEG. Are you talking about development and
initial testing of LPEG itself? Otherwise, the "arbitrarily" definition
of NDEBUG inside LPEG should not botter you.
-- Roberto