lua-l archive
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
] [
Date Index
] [
Thread Index
]
Subject
:
Re: Why non-escaped newlines are prohibited in single-quoted string literals?
From
: Egor Skriptunoff <egor.skriptunoff@
...
>
Date
: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 01:46:45 +0300
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 1:34 AM, Soni L.
<
fakedme@gmail.com
>
wrote:
I wish we had something slightly different:
[\[can\nuse\nescape\ncodes\nhe
re]]
[===\[...]===]
or
[\===[...]===]
?
Follow-Ups
:
Re: Why non-escaped newlines are prohibited in single-quoted string literals?
,
Charles Heywood
References
:
Why non-escaped newlines are prohibited in single-quoted string literals?
,
Egor Skriptunoff
Re: Why non-escaped newlines are prohibited in single-quoted string literals?
,
Soni L.
Prev by Date:
Re: Why non-escaped newlines are prohibited in single-quoted string literals?
Next by Date:
Re: os.time() modifies the argument
Previous by thread:
Re: Why non-escaped newlines are prohibited in single-quoted string literals?
Next by thread:
Re: Why non-escaped newlines are prohibited in single-quoted string literals?
Index(es):
Date
Thread