Re: Why non-escaped newlines are prohibited in single-quoted string literals?

lua-l archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Subject: Re: Why non-escaped newlines are prohibited in single-quoted string literals?
From: Egor Skriptunoff <egor.skriptunoff@...>
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2017 22:42:03 +0300

On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Martin <eden_martin_fuhrspam@gmx.de> wrote:

More correct example is

return whoops 'someone ate tail apostrophe...
and "where is your code highlighting now?"
--'

https://i.imgur.com/yH0vecNg.png

References:
- Why non-escaped newlines are prohibited in single-quoted string literals?, Egor Skriptunoff
- Re: Why non-escaped newlines are prohibited in single-quoted string literals?, Martin
- Re: Why non-escaped newlines are prohibited in single-quoted string literals?, Egor Skriptunoff
- Re: Why non-escaped newlines are prohibited in single-quoted string literals?, Martin

Prev by Date: Re: Why non-escaped newlines are prohibited in single-quoted string literals?
Next by Date: Re: Why non-escaped newlines are prohibited in single-quoted string literals?
Previous by thread: Re: Why non-escaped newlines are prohibited in single-quoted string literals?
Next by thread: Re: Why non-escaped newlines are prohibited in single-quoted string literals?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread