lua-l archive
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
] [
Date Index
] [
Thread Index
]
Subject
:
Re: Why non-escaped newlines are prohibited in single-quoted string literals?
From
: Egor Skriptunoff <egor.skriptunoff@
...
>
Date
: Sun, 29 Jan 2017 18:25:13 +0300
On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 6:00 PM, nobody
<
nobody+lua-list@afra-berlin.de
>
wrote:
also some beginners
Using IDEs like ZeroBrane instead of notepad is highly recommended for beginners.
and (color-)blind people
Even color-blinded people can tune their text editors to use bold/italic/inversion text
attributes to use for syntax highlighting.
I didn't get your point.
You are talking about debuggability but refusing to use tools that facilitating it.
If you want a language that will automatically not admit you to make an error,
you probably should avoid using dynamically typed languages.
Lua gives you flexibility at the cost of your increased responsibility
(and I like this trade-off!).
References
:
Why non-escaped newlines are prohibited in single-quoted string literals?
,
Egor Skriptunoff
Re: Why non-escaped newlines are prohibited in single-quoted string literals?
,
nobody
Re: Why non-escaped newlines are prohibited in single-quoted string literals?
,
Egor Skriptunoff
Re: Why non-escaped newlines are prohibited in single-quoted string literals?
,
nobody
Prev by Date:
Re: Why non-escaped newlines are prohibited in single-quoted string literals?
Next by Date:
Re: Why non-escaped newlines are prohibited in single-quoted string literals?
Previous by thread:
Re: Why non-escaped newlines are prohibited in single-quoted string literals?
Next by thread:
Re: Why non-escaped newlines are prohibited in single-quoted string literals?
Index(es):
Date
Thread