[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: [SUGGESTION] Some lfs functionality in os library, please!
- From: Peter Aronoff <telemachus@...>
- Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 11:00:42 -0400
Daurnimator <email@example.com> wrote:
> As the python community has slowly learned: the standard libraries are
> where functions go to die. see
I often see similar thoughts expressed for Ruby and Perl.
However. Ruby, Perl, and Python are large languages that come with (a lot
of) batteries. They all share a culture of using non-standard libraries.
That is, people make heavy use of CPAN, gems, pip & company. Lua is a tiny
language withot batteries (for the most part, or “with minimal batteries”
if you prefer). It has a culture of “write your own” and “no dependencies”.
So what makes sense for the big trio might not make sense for Lua.
Bottom line: I don’t think problems with other standard libraries are
a knockdown argument against including some (relatively?) basic os-related
functions into Lua’s small stdlib.
We have not been faced with the need to satisfy someone else's
requirements, and for this freedom we are grateful.
Dennis Ritchie and Ken Thompson, The UNIX Time-Sharing System