Re: New array type? (was: 'table' as fallback for tables)

["Thomas Jericke" <tjericke@...>]

-----Original Message----- 
> From: "Soni L." <fakedme@gmail.com> 
> To: "Lua mailing list" <lua-l@lists.lua.org> 
> Date: 08-07-2016 16:43 
> Subject: Re: New array type? (was: 'table' as fallback for tables) 
> 
> On 08/07/16 06:51 AM, Thomas Jericke wrote:
> >
> > Also, while I think your example is legit, I don't think it's such a 
> > common use case that it deserves its own operator.
> > The current implementation of # could easily just be moved to a 
> > function of the table library.
> 
> #"a string"
> 
> vs
> 
> table.len("a string")
> 
> > -- 
> > Thomas
> >
> 
> -- 
> Disclaimer: these emails may be made public at any given time, with or without reason. If you don't agree with this, DO NOT REPLY.

I really don't know what you try to say to me :-/
--
Thomas