[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Can LPeg do basic arithmetic?
- From: Sean Conner <sean@...>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 20:37:49 -0400
It was thus said that the Great Soni L. once stated:
> On 05/07/16 06:34 PM, Sean Conner wrote:
> >It was thus said that the Great Soni L. once stated:
> >>
> >>Too bad it's not pure LPeg, instead deferring to a Lua function for it.
> >
> > What? Is not lpeg.Cf() LPeg, just because it accepts a Lua function as
> > a parameter? So,
> >
> > lpeg.R"09" / { ['o'] = 0 , ['1'] = 1 , ['2'] = 2 ... }
> >
> >is fine, but not?
> >
> > lpeg.R"09" / tonumber
> >
> > If LPeg allows it, it's LPeg.
> >
> > But okay, fine! If you restrict the domain to single digits, then:
> >
> > lpeg.P"0+0" * lpeg.Cc(0)
> > + lpeg.P"0+1" * lpeg.Cc(1)
> > + lpeg.P"0+2" * lpeg.Cc(2)
> > + lpeg.P"0+3" * lpeg.Cc(3)
> > ... and so on. Go crazy with this.
>
> The goal is to never run Lua code for it. Perl regex can run Perl code,
> but the linked math-with-regex thingy doesn't use that and that's the
> whole point. If someone ports LPeg to a different programming language,
> a LPeg that calls Lua code will stop working.
That was never specified as a limititation in your initial post.
> Also, if this was a codegolf or programming puzzle and you weren't
> allowed to use the language's built-in addition subtraction etc, you
> could do it with regex instead.
If this was a codegolf or programming puzzle and you weren't allowed to
use the languages's built-in addition subtraction etc, you wouldn't be
*ABLE* to do this using LPeg. Period. End of story. That '*' in the above
example? That's Lua multiplication operator.
There exists a PEG generator for C [1], but none of the examples would
work in LPeg, mainly because of the embedded C code.
LPeg (and PEGs in general) are not regular expressions, although they can
be used where one would use a regex (the reverse is not true).
-spc (You couldn't even port it to C++ because the ^ and ~ operators
differ between Lua and C++ and thus the precedence rules would be
out of wack ... )
[1] http://piumarta.com/software/peg/