Re: Metamethod madness (was Re: Feature Request, `__next` metamethod.)

[Michal Kottman <k0mpjut0r@...>]

On Jun 24, 2016 11:06, "steve donovan" <steve.j.donovan@gmail.com> wrote:
> A very eloquent argument - equivalent to a Senate filibuster - for not
> adding _any more_!

You surely meant "__any __more" ;-)