[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Putting version information, description, copright into modules
- From: Peter Aronoff <telemachus@...>
- Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 07:38:48 -0500
On Thursday, February 11, 2016 at 02:25PM, Dirk Laurie wrote:
> 2016-02-11 12:17 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Goble <jcgoble3@gmail.com>:
>
> > Standardization would be wonderful.
>
> LuaRocks could be a good place for that. Define standards for metadata
> that the module table should conform to, publish a list of modules that
> meet it. A program could maintain that list.
>
> No censorshop: LuaRocks can still accept any module via the present
> uploading protocol. Only, if they're nonstandard they can be installed
> but re not on the good guys list.
Yes, please. Hisham, thoughts?
--
We have not been faced with the need to satisfy someone else's
requirements, and for this freedom we are grateful.
Dennis Ritchie and Ken Thompson, The UNIX Time-Sharing System
- References:
- Putting version information, description, copright into modules, Marc Balmer
- Re: Putting version information, description, copright into modules, Daniel Silverstone
- Re: Putting version information, description, copright into modules, Jonathan Goble
- Re: Putting version information, description, copright into modules, Dirk Laurie