[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: [Proposal] rawpairs()
- From: "Soni L." <fakedme@...>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 20:07:24 -0200
On 26/01/16 08:02 PM, Dirk Laurie wrote:
2016-01-26 17:50 GMT+02:00 Soni L. <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
`for k, v in next, t do` is a bit less clear than `for k, v in pairs(t) do`
On the contrary, I regard it as an idiom for bypassing __pairs
metamethods and have often used it.
It is not newbie-friendly and a newbie would probably be confused by it.
Disclaimer: these emails may be made public at any given time, with or without reason. If you don't agree with this, DO NOT REPLY.