[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: UTF-8 validation
- From: Daurnimator <quae@...>
- Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 11:00:26 +1100
On 10 December 2015 at 10:55, Coda Highland <email@example.com> wrote:
> Then I submit that your function would be better named "normalize"
> than "validate" since its intent in the workflow is to provide you
> with a safe, canonical form of the string, and it just also lets you
> know if it encountered problems along the way.
"Unicode normalisation" is the name of a different operation.