|
On 07/06/15 05:57 AM, steve donovan wrote:
On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 4:09 AM, Rena <hyperhacker@gmail.com> wrote:unusual. What I've seen in some dialects is that it automatically creates a closure; i.e. `f = v:abs` means the same as `f = function(...) return v:abs(...) end`.That's how I would read it, and how it works in Moonscript. The fact that people have very different meanings attached to the ambiguous syntax v:abs means that it is a bad idea.
Here's better syntactic sugar: v->abs = v:abs()(in C, -> is like . but with a dereference, "dereference" being the key here)
-- Disclaimer: these emails are public and can be accessed from <TODO: get a non-DHCP IP and put it here>. If you do not agree with this, DO NOT REPLY.