[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Definition of a sequence
- From: Roberto Ierusalimschy <roberto@...>
- Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 10:46:23 -0300
> In the light of this fact, is there a good reason why the definition
> of a sequence
> says "the set of its positive numerical keys is equal to {1..n} for some
> non-negative integer n" instead of "the set of its positive integer-valued keys
> is equal to {1..n} for some non-negative integer n"?
Is there a good reason why it should change? Do you really think it is a
good idea to allow fractional keys in between the members of a sequence?
-- Roberto
