[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [ANN] Lua 5.3.0 (rc2) now available
- From: Roberto Ierusalimschy <roberto@...>
- Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2014 16:19:34 -0200
> > There is one warning on Mac OS X (10.10) when compiling in Xcode 6.1.1 with default warnings enabled:
> >
> > /Users/jean-luc/Developpement/lua-5.3.0 - xcode/src/liolib.c:480:16: warning: variable 'c' may be uninitialized when used here [-Wconditional-uninitialized]
> > if (!chop && c == '\n') /* want a newline and have one? */
> > ^
> > /Users/jean-luc/Developpement/lua-5.3.0 - xcode/src/liolib.c:467:8: note: initialize the variable 'c' to silence this warning
> > int c;
> > ^
> > This is a false positive, but hard for the compiler to detect that c is always initialized… :-)
>
> It is not that hard: the only branch in the path from the function head
> to the first assignment to 'c' is obviously false (jump if not (0 <
> some-non-zero-constant)). I am afraid that solving this warning with
> a useless initialization can generate warnings in smarter compilers
> ("value is never used"). I tried to change the code to make it more
> "obvious" that 'c' cannot be used uninitialized, but could not find a
> good solution.
You can try this, but in my view it is hardly an improvement...
--- liolib.c 2014/11/21 12:17:33 2.141
+++ liolib.c 2014/12/31 18:17:02
@@ -470,8 +470,11 @@
char *buff = luaL_prepbuffer(&b); /* pre-allocate buffer */
int i = 0;
l_lockfile(f); /* no memory errors can happen inside the lock */
- while (i < LUAL_BUFFERSIZE && (c = l_getc(f)) != EOF && c != '\n')
+ do {
+ if ((c = l_getc(f)) == EOF || c == '\n')
+ break;
buff[i++] = c;
+ } while (i < LUAL_BUFFERSIZE);
l_unlockfile(f);
luaL_addsize(&b, i);
if (i < LUAL_BUFFERSIZE)
-- Roberto