|
On 2014-12-01 9:55 AM, "Ico Doornekamp" <lua@zevv.nl> wrote:
>
> * On 2014-12-01 15:47:36 +0100, Thiago L. wrote:
>
> > What about 0b1111_1111_1111_1111 etc? (looks cleaner)
>
> I don't know, it seems inconsistent to allow this in binary, but not in
> decimal or hexadecimal.
>
> --
> :wq
> ^X^Cy^K^X^C^C^C^C
>
Could it not be allowed there as well?
--
Sent from my Game Boy.