Re: Does PIL (3rd edition) repeatedly misuse the length operator on tables and invoke undefined behavior?

[polyglot@...]

On 2014-09-18 02:00, Daurnimator wrote:
> On 17 September 2014 11:47, <polyglot@openmailbox.org> wrote:
>
> > The main problem, however, is that any integer less than 1 produces
> > the
> > empty set. Try n = -42 with your for loop.
>
> Is that a problem?

Depends.

a = {}
a[#a + 1] = 'foo'

Would you be happy with #a = -42? What about #a = (some random integer 
<= 0)?