Re: ipairs in Lua 5.3.0-alpha

[Dirk Laurie <dirk.laurie@...>]

2014-08-05 4:16 GMT+02:00 Coroutines <coroutines@gmail.com>:
> I don't like raw*() -- I wish we had a debug.raw(self, metamethod_name)

2014-08-07 10:46 GMT+02:00 Mason Bogue <scythe+lua@ortsz.com>:
> I think the way I would approach this ipairs thing would be to move all of
> the raw* functions to a raw.* library, with raw.set(tbl, k, v),
> raw.ipairs(t), raw.equals(a, b) and so forth.

I support either of these ideas rather than keeping them in
the base library itself. Both allow compatibility to be
restored with one assignment statement per function.