[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: shared library, symbols names and Linux distributions
- From: Enrico Tassi <gares@...>
- Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2014 16:44:17 +0200
On Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 07:10:32AM -0700, Coroutines wrote:
> Currently shared libraries aren't done because (as I understand it)
> it's tricky to build a shared library for each platform -- and libtool
> is a dependency PUC-Rio doesn't want for its complexity. If one were
I know the authors of Lua do not recomment it, but Linux ditributions
can't live with static linking. It is really not an option.
> to make a shared library target for Linux, this is how one might do
> symbol versioning like glibc: http://www.trevorpounds.com/blog/?p=33
This is another option, but what I proposed is simpler and needs no
special support from the toolchain.