Re: [OT] Interesting answer to why dynamic languages are hard for large code bases

lua-l archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [OT] Interesting answer to why dynamic languages are hard for large code bases
From: Petite Abeille <petite.abeille@...>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2014 21:45:18 +0200

On Jul 1, 2014, at 8:41 PM, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo <lhf@tecgraf.puc-rio.br> wrote:

> A week from today, it'll be exactly 20 years since Lua 1.1 was released.

Happy Seijin shiki!

References:
- [OT] Interesting answer to why dynamic languages are hard for large code bases, Andrew Starks
- Re: [OT] Interesting answer to why dynamic languages are hard for large code bases, Marc Balmer
- Re: [OT] Interesting answer to why dynamic languages are hard for large code bases, Aaron B.
- Re: [OT] Interesting answer to why dynamic languages are hard for large code bases, Philippe Lhoste
- Re: [OT] Interesting answer to why dynamic languages are hard for large code bases, Francisco Olarte
- Re: [OT] Interesting answer to why dynamic languages are hard for large code bases, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo

Prev by Date: OT: Wrote a Lua-extensible OSX window manager
Next by Date: [OT] Wrote a Lua-extensible OSX window manager
Previous by thread: Re: [OT] Interesting answer to why dynamic languages are hard for large code bases
Next by thread: Re: [OT] Interesting answer to why dynamic languages are hard for large code bases
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread