[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Makefile vs LUA_PATH inconsistency
- From: Jay Carlson <nop@...>
- Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 10:14:33 -0400
On May 20, 2014 8:42 AM, "Andrew Starks" <andrew.starks@trms.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 20, 2014, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo <lhf@tecgraf.puc-rio.br> wrote:
>>
>> > It seems that plain MinGW doesn't have `rm` or `install` executables
>> > (or a `mkdir` that understands `-p`), so you really have to work hard
>> > to make the install target work for MinGW ...
>>
>> We haven't got any complaints about this but perhaps we should just
>> remove the mingw target and avoid noise?
> If support for MinGW is needed, I'd suggest adjusting the makefile to Do The Right Thing during make install when mingw was the platform choice during make and leave luaconf.h alone. I don't know how one could do this, however...
Is the right "make install" target on mingw this?
echo Your lua.exe, luac.exe, and lua.dll are in the src directory. Enjoy!
- References:
- Re: Makefile vs LUA_PATH inconsistency, Dirk Laurie
- RE: Makefile vs LUA_PATH inconsistency, Thijs Schreijer
- Re: Makefile vs LUA_PATH inconsistency, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
- Re: Makefile vs LUA_PATH inconsistency, Ulrich Schmidt
- RE: Makefile vs LUA_PATH inconsistency, Thijs Schreijer
- Re: Makefile vs LUA_PATH inconsistency, Philipp Janda
- RE: Makefile vs LUA_PATH inconsistency, Thijs Schreijer
- Re: Makefile vs LUA_PATH inconsistency, Philipp Janda
- RE: Makefile vs LUA_PATH inconsistency, Thijs Schreijer
- Re: Makefile vs LUA_PATH inconsistency, Philipp Janda
- Re: Makefile vs LUA_PATH inconsistency, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
- Re: Makefile vs LUA_PATH inconsistency, Andrew Starks