[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Makefile vs LUA_PATH inconsistency
- From: steve donovan <steve.j.donovan@...>
- Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 12:05:02 +0200
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Thijs Schreijer
<thijs@thijsschreijer.nl> wrote:
> I agree, but it also doesn't hurt to adopt those, does it? And adopting them would resolve a number of minor newbie issues, like default installations not working.
Well, newbies will download a distribution, like the LuaDist
batteries, or use some other prepackaged install. Separate Lua
versions have their own names and locations, so they have their local
trees.
I must say I don't see the problem; I've never thought that the
default makefile should have Windows install targets, since (a) a
newcomer won't go that route and (b) it's meant for POSIX systems.
