Re: Long chains of objects (aka tables)

[Coda Highland <chighland@...>]

On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Andrew Starks <andrew.starks@trms.com> wrote:
> All alternatives presented thus far are less clear than either option. The
> present syntax only suffers from being extremely verbose (and in the above
> example, 3 local lookups and 9 field lookups vs 1 / 3 for the success case)
> and thus arguably less clear.

Hey, that's not true, I'm a big fan of the __div/__idiv suggestion. It
even LOOKS like navigating a hierarchy.

/s/ Adam