Re: [Challenge] Smallest table copy

[Philipp Janda <siffiejoe@...>]

Am 08.05.2014 15:47 schröbte Thiago L.:
> I wonder if less than 239 chars is possible (maybe with some
> load()/loadstring() trickery?)
Sure. Using Paul's trick I'm currently at 230 bytes (234 if you don't 
like global `next`). But it's based on my original proposal, so you 
won't like it ...
But using `load` is an interesting idea (e.g. for avoiding the 
`function` keyword) ...
Philipp