Re: 5.3 work 2 documentation for int types

[Roberto Ierusalimschy <roberto@...>]

> lua_Integer[1] and lua_Unsigned[2] expose the underlying types in the
> documentation and there is an error with the former being long long and
> the later being unsigned long.
> I personally think it would be better to have unsigned lua_Integer if it
> is to be documented.
> 
> [1] http://www.lua.org/work/doc/manual.html#lua_Integer
> [2] http://www.lua.org/work/doc/manual.html#lua_Unsigned

Thanks for the feedback.

-- Roberto