[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: RE: [ANN] Lua 5.3.0 (work2) now available
- From: Thijs Schreijer <thijs@...>
- Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 21:04:14 +0000
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lua-l-bounces@lists.lua.org [mailto:lua-l-bounces@lists.lua.org] On
> Behalf Of Philipp Janda
> Sent: zondag 23 maart 2014 21:55
> To: lua-l@lists.lua.org
> Subject: Re: [ANN] Lua 5.3.0 (work2) now available
>
> Am 23.03.2014 21:39 schröbte Thijs Schreijer:
> >
> > Thx. I understand the logic. But still would find '!' clearer for a unary
> not.
>
> C uses `!` for logical not. It might get confusing if Lua used it for
> bitwise not ...
>
> > Thijs
> >
>
> Philipp
>
True, thx for pointing that out. Let me drop the preference. Restating; I think that in practice it will be confusing that 'xor' and 'unary not' have the same operator.
Thijs
