Re: [proposal] Concerns about math.random

["Liam Devine" <liamdevine@...>]

On 22/03/14 10:16, Jeremy Ong wrote:
> 
> That said,
> I think the documentation should make it clear that math.random will
> not produce good results and shouldn't be used for any crypto
> whatsoever.
> 

Well, it basically already says that in a clear mannor:
"This function is an interface to the simple pseudo-random generator
function rand provided by Standard C. (No guarantees can be given for
its statistical properties.)"


-- 
Liam

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature