On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Javier Guerra Giraldez <javier@guerrag.com> wrote:
if you pass full-blown
objects, you're supposed to have the relevant code in the receiving
side, and then just have to tag appropriately.
This is a great point. DCOM in Microsoft-land was designed to facilitate this. It's not trivial to do and there may be many ways to do it.
It answers the "should I be passing functions" question. However, one is left to invent ways to associate generic structures with specific classes/functions. The original questions might still be relevant, in that sense.
