 |
lua-l archive |
|
|
||
|
On 14 Jan 2014 03:52, "Andrew Starks" <andrew.starks@trms.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, January 13, 2014, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:37 AM, Andrew Starks <andrew.starks@trms.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > I don't have LuaJit installed and would not install it (and migrate
>> > everything I do over to it) just to use a library. By way of example, your
>> > library may as well have been written for Python, for as much good as it
>> > would be to me.
>> >
>> > By contrast, if you stick to the subset of 5.2 that 5.1 supports, and / or
>> > use a bit of the luacomp library, then anyone with lua 5.1, luajit or Lua
>> > 5.2 can use it.
>> >
>> > The question, from a user's perspective is: what benefit are you giving me,
>> > in exchange for locking me into luajit, as a dependency?
>> >
>> > Even if I am using Luajit, that doesn't mean that I don't need to support
>> > the current, mainline distribution and straight 5.1. So, I can't use your
>> > library as a dependency, if this were the case.
>> >
>> > It's easier for you if you like what the FFI gives you. Supporting the
>> > common subset and using luacompat, as necessary, is the simplest, for the
>> > user.
>> >
>> > IMHO, of course
>>
>> That's a fairly compelling opinion. The only thing against it is the
>> temptation of using FFI in the default scripts that we ship with cgit.
>> But I suppose for the sake of giving users choice later on, it might
>> be best, as you've said, to continue to support both, and let the user
>> choose.
>
>
> Jason,
>
> I also just remembered this:
>
> https://github.com/jmckaskill/luaffi
>
> Which is a luajit compatible FFI extension for Lua 5.1 and Lua 5.2, but 5.2 is listed as beta. It might be worth a shot, if it lets you gain some of those conveniences and keep a broad support base.
>
Lua 5.2 support is fine for luaffi, but both are beta, and you have to fix the bugs yourself as it is only intermittently being developed (by me).
The most important platform that LuaJIT is not available for is probably softfloat MIPS (eg openwrt).
Justin