Re: table.new in 5.3?

[Rena <hyperhacker@...>]

On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Tom N Harris <telliamed@whoopdedo.org> wrote:

On Thursday, November 21, 2013 11:40:02 AM steve donovan wrote:
> It moved from "would be nice to have table.new" to "here are all the
> things on the C side I would like to expose".
>
> Very easy to write a little extension to do most of these things, of
> course....

Especially since I don't see it ever appearing in PUC Lua. It violates the
"array-part/hash-part is just an implementation detail" contract.

--
tom <telliamed@whoopdedo.org>

In that case, why is it exposed in the C API?

--
Sent from my Game Boy.