lua-users home
lua-l archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

On 1 November 2013 08:43, Roberto Ierusalimschy <> wrote:
>> Actually that's wrong. The grammar is very, very close to being an LALR(1) grammar. I only needed to change the rule:
>> [...]
> What is wrong?

I suppose Robert misread this

> In particular, the grammar in
> the implementation is far from good for a tool like yacc. "the grammar in the _specification_ is far from good for a tool
like yacc" (since he then follows by showing how the grammar in the
manual is almost suitable for a yacc-like tool).

-- Hisham