[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Perl, Python, Ruby, PHP, C, C++, Lua, tcl, javascript and Java comparison
- From: Philippe Lhoste <PhiLho@...>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 11:41:32 +0200
On 15/07/2013 19:24, Roberto Ierusalimschy wrote:
Maybe this should be of interest:
http://raid6.com.au/~onlyjob/posts/arena/
This test is ridiculous. Whoever wrote the code does not know how
to program in Lua (or in Java or in Javascript).
Indeed. Writing code that seems specially designed to generate lot of garbage is good to
give Java a bad name: lot of CPU to create the objects and do the copy of data, lot of
memory used until the garbage collector kicks in, and no warm up phase.
It is not better for other languages with immutable strings and GC, etc.
Pointless benchmarks (no real world code) are pointless.
--
Philippe Lhoste
-- (near) Paris -- France
-- http://Phi.Lho.free.fr
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Perl, Python, Ruby, PHP, C, C++, Lua, tcl, javascript and Java comparison, steve donovan
- Re: Perl, Python, Ruby, PHP, C, C++, Lua, tcl, javascript and Java comparison, Philipp Janda
- References:
- Perl, Python, Ruby, PHP, C, C++, Lua, tcl, javascript and Java comparison, Daniel Bolgheroni
- Re: Perl, Python, Ruby, PHP, C, C++, Lua, tcl, javascript and Java comparison, Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Prev by Date:
Re: Lua 5.3 work1 Considering math.isinteger or type()
- Next by Date:
Re: Perl, Python, Ruby, PHP, C, C++, Lua, tcl, javascript and Java comparison
- Previous by thread:
Re: Perl, Python, Ruby, PHP, C, C++, Lua, tcl, javascript and Java comparison
- Next by thread:
Re: Perl, Python, Ruby, PHP, C, C++, Lua, tcl, javascript and Java comparison
- Index(es):